Business-Blog
24, Dec 2025

Section 242 of Companies Act 2013 – When the NCLT Steps In to Fix Oppression and Mismanagement

Companies don’t always fall apart loudly. Sometimes the damage happens quietly. Decisions taken behind closed doors. Minority voices ignored. Power concentrated where it shouldn’t be. That’s exactly where Section 242 comes into play.

Under The Companies Act, Section 242 exists for situations where things have gone wrong inside a company, but shutting it down completely would cause even more harm. Instead of punishing blindly, the law gives corrective power. Real power.

This provision empowers the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) to step in when oppression or mismanagement is proved under Section 241. And not just step in symbolically — but actively fix what’s broken.


What Section 242 Really Allows the NCLT to Do

Once the Tribunal is satisfied that oppression or mismanagement exists, it doesn’t stop at observation. It acts.

Section 242 gives the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) the power to make orders to end matters of oppression or mismanagement within a company, as described in Section 241. That power is broad, flexible, and intentionally so.

The idea is simple. If winding up the company would unfairly harm certain members, then correction is better than closure.

And correction can take many forms.


Powers of the Tribunal – Not Just on Paper

The Powers of Tribunal under Section 242 are practical, not theoretical. Depending on the situation, the NCLT can reshape how the company functions going forward.

Some of the key actions include:

  • Ordering the regulation of conduct of affairs of the company in future

  • Mandating the purchase of shares of oppressed members

  • Changing the management structure

  • Removing or appointing directors

  • Restricting share transfers if they are being misused

This isn’t about micromanagement. It’s about stopping abuse of power.


Regulation of Future Conduct – The Real Strength of Section 242

One of the most impactful aspects of Section 242 is prevention.

Instead of waiting for the next violation, the Tribunal can regulate how decisions are taken in the future. Board approvals. Voting rights. Financial controls. All of it can be guided by NCLT directions.

This regulation of conduct of affairs of the company in future ensures that the same group cannot repeat the same tactics again.

It’s corrective, yes. But also protective.


Share Purchase Orders and Management Changes

In many oppression cases, the relationship between members is already damaged beyond repair. Forcing people to stay invested together rarely works.

That’s why the Tribunal can:

  • Order majority shareholders or the company itself to buy out minority shares

  • Ensure valuation is fair

  • Allow an exit without destroying the company

Similarly, when mismanagement comes directly from those in control, the NCLT doesn’t hesitate to intervene. Directors can be removed. New ones can be appointed. Power can be redistributed.

All this is done provided that a winding-up order would unfairly prejudice certain members. That condition matters.


Why Section 242 Matters for Corporate Governance

Without this provision, minority shareholders would be left with two extreme options: tolerate abuse or seek winding up.

Section 242 fills the gap.

It protects:

  • Minority shareholders

  • Investors

  • The company itself

By giving structured authority to the Tribunal, The Companies Act ensures that fairness is enforced without killing viable businesses.


What Happens If NCLT Orders Are Ignored?

Ignoring an NCLT order under Section 242 is not a casual mistake.

Consequences can include:

  • Legal action against directors

  • Personal liability

  • Loss of investor trust

  • Further regulatory scrutiny

Once the Tribunal intervenes, compliance is not optional.


Quick Takeaways (Because Not Everyone Reads Till the End)

  • Section 242 works alongside Section 241

  • It empowers the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) to correct oppression and mismanagement

  • The Tribunal can regulate future conduct, restructure management, and mandate share purchases

  • Winding up is avoided when it would unfairly harm members

  • Non-compliance with NCLT orders leads to serious consequences


If your company is facing internal disputes, minority oppression, or management deadlock, early legal guidance makes all the difference. Callmyca.com helps you file, respond, and comply with Section 241 and 242 matters smoothly — before issues spiral out of control.