Most people hear about income tax only when they file returns, receive an intimation, or interact with an Assessing Officer. But behind every assessment, refund, appeal, penalty, or notice, there is a large administrative structure working silently. Section 116 of the Income-tax Act lays down this structure. It defines the hierarchy of income-tax authorities who are empowered to administer the Act, monitor compliance, carry out investigations, issue refunds, review cases, and resolve disputes.
Section 116 may appear procedural, but it is actually one of the foundational sections because it ensures order, accountability, & control within the tax system. Without a defined structure of authorities, it would be impossible to enforce tax laws in a fair and organized manner. In this article, we explore the depth of Section 116, its purpose, and why taxpayers should know whom they are interacting with.
What Section 116 of the Income-tax Act Says
Section 116 states:
“There shall be the following classes of income-tax authorities.”
It then lists them in a hierarchical order, starting from the highest authority to the lowest. These authorities handle different levels of responsibilities, from policy interpretation to ground-level assessment work. The structure ensures smooth functioning & allows for an organized administration of tax laws.
Section 116 not only identifies the authorities but also lays the foundation for assigning powers & duties under subsequent sections. Without this hierarchy, procedures such as assessment, appeal, tax collection, penalty imposition, or investigation would lack clarity and authority.
Hierarchy of Income-Tax Authorities Under Section 116
Section 116 outlines a clear and systematic list of authorities. The hierarchy includes:
- The Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT)
- Principal Director General or Director General
- Principal Chief Commissioner or Chief Commissioner"
- Principal Commissioner or Commissioner
- Additional Director, Joint Director, Deputy Director, Assistant Director
- Additional Commissioner, Joint Commissioner, Deputy Commissioner, Assistant Commissioner
- Income-tax Officers
- Tax Recovery Officers
- Inspectors of Income-tax
This structure ensures that authority flows downward clearly, responsibilities are defined, and taxpayers know exactly which authority they are interacting with. Each authority has specific powers assigned under different sections, including assessment powers, penalty powers, investigation rights, and administrative control.
Also Read: A Gateway to Optimised Taxation for Individuals & NRIs
Why a Hierarchy Was Necessary – The Administrative Logic Behind Section 116
In a country as large & diverse as India, tax administration cannot function without a well-defined hierarchy. Taxpayers live in different states, follow different incomes, & engage in varied financial activities. To ensure uniformity, the law requires a centralized body (CBDT) supported by multiple regional and field authorities.
Section 116 helps maintain:
✔ Accountability
✔ Transparency
✔ Ease of administration
✔ Division of work
✔ Escalation procedure for disputes
✔ Separation of powers
This is why the Income-tax Act starts its administrative chapter with Section 116 – it sets the backbone of the entire tax machinery.
How Section 116 Helps in Organized Administration of Tax Laws
Every authority performs a unique role:
- CBDT creates the policies
- Commissioners interpret & implement them
- Assessing Officers handle actual assessments
- Inspectors assist in ground-level enquiries
- Tax Recovery Officers enforce recovery
- Appellate authorities review disputes
This creates a structured, disciplined flow of work. Without Section 116 clearly defining these authorities, the tax department would lack consistency & internal control.
In short, Section 116 helps in the organized administration of tax laws by clearly establishing who does what.
Section 116 and Its Relation to Assessment Procedures Under Section 147
While Section 116 deals with the hierarchy of authorities, it indirectly influences several other sections, especially reassessment under Section 147. For instance, only specific authorities such as:
- Assessing Officers
- Joint Commissioners
- Commissioners
have the legal power to reopen assessments, authorize reassessment actions, or approve penalty orders.
Thus, Section 116 governs which authority is permitted to act under Section 147 & ensures that powers are not misused or exercised by the wrong authority. A reassessment is valid only when initiated by the correct officer listed in Section 116.
Also Read: Taxation Rules for Non-Residents on Dividends, Interest, Royalties & Fees
Common Misconception – Section 116 Is Not About Tax Computation
Some taxpayers mistakenly assume that Section 116 deals with computation, deductions, or set-off. However, those functions belong to Sections like 70–80, Section-32, and Chapter VI-A.
Section 116 is purely about administrative hierarchy, not tax calculations.
However, your keywords include the clause:
“Section-116 seeks to provide for carry forward and set off of losses & unabsorbed depreciation.”
This wording refers to a specific provision in Canadian tax legislation (Income Tax Act of Canada), not the Indian Income-tax Act, 1961.
The Indian Section 116 DOES NOT relate to set-off or carry forward of losses.
But the phrase can still be used naturally by clarifying the distinction.
How Section 116 Differs From Section 116 of Other Jurisdictions
In some countries, such as Canada, Section 116 seeks to provide for carry forward & set off of losses and unabsorbed depreciation. However, in India, Section 116 has a completely different purpose. It is strictly an administrative section that deals with the classes of income-tax authorities.
This comparison is important because taxpayers often confuse these provisions when reading tax content online. Indian Section 116 does not provide deductions or computational reliefs; rather, it defines the administrative structure behind assessments, appeals, & enforcement.
Does Section 116 Apply to Non-Residents?
Your keyword reference mentions:
“If a non-resident person proposes to dispose of any taxable Canadian property.”
This again relates to Canadian tax law (ITA Canada Section 116)."
To incorporate your keyword naturally while staying accurate:
In India, Section 116 does not deal with non-residents disposing of taxable property. That concept belongs to Canadian laws, not the Indian Income-tax Act. However, understanding foreign parallels helps taxpayers avoid confusion when researching international tax rules. India’s Section 116 remains strictly administrative.
Also Read: Special Provisions for Non-Residents Turning Resident
Why Taxpayers Should Know Section 116
Even though Section 116 does not involve tax slabs or deductions, it matters because taxpayers often interact with the authorities it mentions. Knowing the authority structure helps you understand:
- whom you are responding to
- who has the power to issue a notice"
- who can impose penalties
- how appeals are escalated
This knowledge creates transparency and helps taxpayers avoid confusion during compliance.
Section 116 Builds the Foundation of Indian Tax Administration
Section 116 of the Income-tax Act may seem like a simple listing of authorities, but it is one of the most crucial provisions for the country’s tax administration. It outlines the hierarchy of official Income-tax authorities, helps in the organized administration of tax laws, and ensures every officer functions within a clearly defined structure. Without Section 116, there would be no clarity on who holds which powers, leading to inconsistency & confusion.
Want hassle-free help with notices, assessments, or tax compliance? Visit Callmyca.com — your trusted online CA for fast, reliable, expert tax support!
