Most taxpayers today have never heard of Section 137 because it vanished from the Income Tax Act decades ago. But at one point, it played a major role. Section 137 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 was omitted by the Finance Act of 1964, which means it officially disappeared from the law on April 1, 1964. Before it was removed, this section had one main purpose: to prohibit public servants from disclosing taxpayer information to anyone else.
Back then, the idea of confidentiality was extremely strict. The law wanted to protect taxpayers & ensure their information stayed between them and the government. In today’s digital era, where data security and privacy rules are stronger, it’s interesting to see how early India tried to implement these protections.
What Section 137 Originally Intended to Do
Before its omission, Section 137 was designed as a protective wall. It ensured that information submitted in returns, assessment orders, statements, documents, or inquiries could not be revealed by income tax officers, public servants, or any other authority. This included both financial details and personal information.
The section made privacy the top priority by:
• preventing disclosure to other government departments"
• restricting access even during court proceedings
• penalizing wrongful sharing of taxpayer information
Its purpose was simple but powerful — no one outside the tax department had the right to know your income, profits, assets, books, or personal details unless the law itself specifically permitted it.
Why Section 137 Was Removed From the Income Tax Act
In 1964, when the Finance Act removed Section 137, India’s tax administration was going through a major transformation. The country was moving toward a system where transparency, audit, anti-corruption measures, and cross-department coordination became essential. Total secrecy was no longer practical.
There were several reasons behind its omission:
• Fraud and tax evasion were rising, & secrecy made detection harder.
• Courts and investigative agencies needed access to taxpayer documents.
• Economic reforms required easier data sharing across departments.
• Strict confidentiality created loopholes for misuse.
Thus, over time, Section 137 was seen as too restrictive & not aligned with the needs of a growing economy. So it was removed — but privacy did not disappear.
Also Read: Section 10(12A): The Tax-Free Exit Door for NPS Withdrawals
If Section 137 Is Gone, How Is Taxpayer Privacy Protected Today?
Even though Section 137 was omitted, taxpayers still enjoy strong confidentiality protections under modern laws. Today, the Income Tax Act and other statutes ensure privacy through:
• Section 138 (which replaced the secrecy rules with a more flexible system)
• The Information Technology Act
• CBDT guidelines on data privacy
• PAN-Aadhaar security protocols
• Digital encryption and secure e-filing systems
Under Section 138, the tax department may share information, but only with written authorization & only when it serves legitimate public or legal interest.
Therefore, while Section 137 is gone, confidentiality still exists — it’s just more balanced and practical.
How the Removal of Section 137 Improved Tax Administration
When Section 137 existed, even genuine information requests were blocked. This made tax enforcement inefficient and gave dishonest taxpayers a shield. After its removal, tax administration became more coordinated and capable.
Improvements included:
• sharing information with police, courts, and other authorities
• smoother audits and investigations
• improved detection of shell companies"
• reduced fraudulent tax refunds & evasion
• better inter-departmental cooperation
The system became more transparent while still keeping taxpayer rights intact.
Where Old Confidentiality Rules Still Influence Today’s Tax Law
Even though Section 137 doesn’t exist anymore, its spirit lives on within the Income Tax Act. For example:
• Tax officers cannot disclose information casually.
• Sensitive details remain protected under Section 138.
• Only authorized persons may access financial data.
This ensures a balance between transparency and privacy.
Also Read: Gift of tax relief on investment in NPS!
How Scientific Research Deductions Connect With the Omitted Section
The Income Tax Act allows deductions while computing taxes for expenses relating to scientific research, and these benefits continue today. In fact, modern tax law allows:
• deduction for scientific research & development activities
• deduction for expenditure of a capital nature on scientific research
• specific provisions for claiming R&D deductions
When Section 137 existed, even these deduction-related submissions were protected under strict confidentiality. Today, privacy still applies, but with transparency when required.
How Section 137 Related Indirectly to Other Tax Provisions
Even though it has been omitted, Section 137 still connects historically to many provisions we use today, such as:
- Sukanya Samriddhi Yojana Income Tax Section
Investments under SSY enjoy deductions under Section 80C, & private financial details remain protected through modern privacy rules.
- Section 86 of Income Tax Act
Taxation of income from AOPs is structured with transparency, supported by modern disclosure rules rather than Section 137 secrecy.
This exemption applies to certain authorities, but taxpayer data related to them is now shared only through structured permissions.
- Section 15H
Senior citizens filing Form 15H share sensitive financial data, which remains safeguarded through regulated IT systems.
- Person Definition in Income Tax Section
All individuals, companies, HUFs, and other persons whose data was once protected by Section 137 now remain covered under newer privacy safeguards.
- Section 69D of Income Tax Act
Deals with unexplained hundi transactions — which often required disclosure of sensitive information, now managed through modern provisions.
Section 137 paved the way for thinking about privacy, but the modern laws handle it better.
A Real-Life Example to Understand Section 137’s Purpose
Imagine the year is 1962. A taxpayer submits their income details to the tax department. If a police officer, a magistrate, or even a government department asks the tax officer for these details, Section 137 prevents any disclosure. The officer must keep everything secret, even if the information is needed for investigation.
While this protected taxpayer privacy, it also allowed certain individuals to misuse secrecy.
Fast forward to today. Under Section 138, the same officer may share information, but only:
• with written approval
• with proper justification"
• for legal or statutory purposes
This flexibility ensures fairness & protection — something Section 137 could not balance properly.
Also Read: Sukanya Samriddhi Yojana: Triple Tax Benefit Under Section 80C
Why Section 137 Still Matters Even Though It’s Gone
Understanding Section 137 helps taxpayers appreciate how India’s tax system evolved. It shows how early tax law focused heavily on secrecy, while today’s law focuses on security, transparency, and responsible disclosure.
It also highlights that:
• taxpayer privacy remains important
• enforcement must not be blocked by extreme secrecy
• modern laws must adapt to new challenges
The omission of Section 137 represents the point where India shifted towards a more modern, efficient tax structure.
Final Thoughts
Section 137 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 may no longer exist, but it remains an important chapter in the history of taxpayer privacy. It originally restricted public servants from disclosing taxpayer information, but it was eventually removed to strengthen transparency & improve tax enforcement. Today, modern laws ensure a better balance — where privacy is protected without compromising the nation’s need for accountability.
Need help with tax filings, notices, or compliance? Visit Callmyca.com — your personal CA is just one click away!
